LLC Derivative Action in New York: Suing Managers Who Harm Your Own Company
Updated: 7 hours ago
Updated October 22, 2026
You own 25% of a Bronx contracting LLC with two college friends. Over the past year, your managing member has been quietly routing profitable jobs to a side company he owns alone. That work should have hit your LLC's books and your distribution check. When you confronted him, he shrugged and said you're a minority member with no real power. He's wrong. An LLC derivative action in New York is the tool the law gives you to sue on behalf of the company itself and ask a court to order a self-dealing manager to return diverted profits to the company.
What follows is a practical guide to how these cases work in New York County, Kings, Queens, Nassau, and Suffolk Supreme Courts, including the procedural traps that sink derivative complaints before they ever reach discovery.
Key takeaways
An LLC derivative action lets a member sue on the company's behalf when insiders harm the LLC, and any recovery goes to the company.
Figure out early whether the harm hit the company or you personally, because pleading the wrong type of claim can get counts dismissed.
Confirm you are a member, both when the wrong happened and now, before filing a derivative suit.
Make a written demand on management first, or plead specific facts showing why a demand would have been futile.
Use your right to inspect the books and records before you file, while the evidence is still intact.
What is an LLC derivative action in New York and when can you bring one?
An LLC derivative action in New York is a lawsuit you bring as a member, but on behalf of the LLC itself, against insiders, usually a managing member or another member, who have harmed the company. You're not suing for your own personal loss. You're suing because the company has a claim that whoever runs the company refuses to pursue, usually because they're the wrongdoer.
Any recovery goes to the LLC, not directly into your pocket. As a member you'll benefit when the company's value or distributions rise back to where they should have been, but the check is written to the company.
The clearest case is self-dealing: a managing member who steers contracts to a side business, takes excessive salary or "consulting fees" not authorized by the operating agreement, or sells company assets to themselves at a discount. Wasting company funds, ignoring corporate opportunities, and misappropriating intellectual property are other common triggers. If the wrong harms you personally as a member but not the LLC (for example, a freeze-out from distributions you alone are owed), that's usually a direct claim, not a derivative one. Most members get this distinction wrong on day one, and pleading a derivative claim as if it were direct (or vice versa) is one of the fastest ways to get a motion to dismiss granted in commercial court.
Something we see again and again: the same warning signs come up in partnership and LLC disputes. You're shut out of decisions, you can't get the books and records, communication stops, the expenses don't add up, or important promises were only ever made verbally.
If your dispute is closer to a personal lockout than a company-level harm, our piece on minority LLC freeze-out covers the direct-claim path.
How did Tzolis v. Wolff establish LLC derivative standing in New York?
In New York, LLC members have the right to bring derivative actions on behalf of their LLC, even though the Limited Liability Company Law (unlike the Business Corporation Law, which expressly authorizes shareholder derivative suits under BCL § 626) contains no provision granting derivative standing to LLC members. The legislature had actually considered including one and dropped it.
Despite that silence, the Court of Appeals in Tzolis held that LLC members have a common-law right to sue derivatively. The reasoning: without derivative standing, a controlling member could loot the LLC with impunity and minority members would have no remedy. That outcome was incompatible with centuries of equity practice, where courts have long allowed beneficiaries to enforce duties owed to an entity when the fiduciaries refuse to do so.
Since Tzolis, New York courts have applied to LLC derivative claims many of the same procedural rules that govern shareholder derivative suits (including demand requirements and pleading standards), borrowing from BCL § 626 by analogy. Practically, this means that when you sue derivatively in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Nassau, or Suffolk Supreme Court, the judge will expect your pleadings to look very much like a corporate derivative complaint, with the company named as a nominal defendant and the recovery flowing to the entity rather than to you.
What must you allege and prove in an LLC derivative action in New York?
To survive a motion to dismiss, you need to plead with specificity three things: that you were a member when the wrong occurred and still are; that the LLC has a viable claim — typically breach of fiduciary duty, waste, self-dealing, or conversion; and that either you made a pre-suit demand on management to bring the claim and that demand was wrongfully refused, or that demand would have been futile.
Membership is a threshold issue. In Harounian v. Harounian, 198 A.D.3d 734 (2d Dep't 2021), the Second Department held that a plaintiff who was not a member of the LLCs lacked standing to sue derivatively on their behalf. It also dismissed derivative claims that did not plead a demand or futility. Before filing, check the operating agreement and company records to confirm you are actually a member.
The substantive cause of action is usually breach of fiduciary duty. Managing members in New York owe duties of loyalty and care to the LLC and its other members. The duty of loyalty bars self-dealing, usurping company opportunities, and competing with the LLC without consent. The duty of care requires managers to act with the level of attention a reasonably prudent person would exercise in their own affairs. When a managing member sets up a side entity to skim revenue, both duties are usually breached at once.
Specificity matters. New York requires fraud-based claims to be pleaded with particularity under CPLR § 3016(b), which means you have to lay out the who, what, when, where, and how of each wrongful act. Vague allegations of "mismanagement" or "self-dealing" won't survive. If your complaint is rooted in fraud allegations, our deep-dive on pleading fraud under CPLR 3016(b) walks through what specificity looks like in practice.
Damages in a derivative case are measured by the harm to the LLC, not to you personally. That can include disgorgement of profits taken by the wrongdoer, restitution of misappropriated assets, a formal accounting of company funds, and in egregious cases punitive damages. Courts can also impose a constructive trust on assets the manager acquired with diverted company money — which is often the only way to recover when the wrongdoer has hidden cash inside real estate or another entity.
How is a derivative action different from a direct claim or an LLCL § 702 dissolution?
A derivative action targets harm to the LLC, while a direct claim targets harm to you personally and an LLCL § 702 dissolution petition asks the court to end the LLC entirely. Picking the wrong vehicle, or skipping one you needed to bring, can cost you the entire case.
A direct claim is the right tool when the injury runs to you alone. If your managing member stops sending K-1s only to you, blocks only your distributions, or interferes with your individual contractual rights under the operating agreement, those are direct injuries. The remedy benefits you directly.
A derivative action is the right tool when the company is bleeding. If a manager diverted $800,000 in customer payments to a personal account, the LLC is the entity that lost the money. You sue on its behalf, and any recovery goes back to the company — increasing its value and your indirect share. In Maldonado v. DiBre, 140 A.D.3d 1501 (3d Dep't 2016), the court treated claims of diverted profits, misuse of company property and mismanagement as derivative, not direct. It also held that members who had sold their units lost standing to continue those claims.
Judicial dissolution under LLCL § 702 is the nuclear option. You're asking the court to wind the business down because it's no longer "reasonably practicable" to carry on the LLC in conformity with its operating agreement. In Matter of 1545 Ocean Avenue, LLC, 72 A.D.3d 121 (2d Dep't 2010), the Second Department explained that a § 702 petition is initially a contract-based analysis. The court first looks at the operating agreement to decide whether the LLC can reasonably practicably carry on its business in conformity with it, and the test is not the same as the one for dissolving a corporation or partnership. Our explainer on the not reasonably practicable standard breaks the test down step by step.
Many complex business-divorce cases combine all three. A typical Commercial Division complaint might plead a derivative cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty by the managing member, a direct cause of action for breach of the operating agreement, and a dissolution petition under § 702 in the alternative. The relief sought in each count has to match the theory pleaded. Judges will pick that apart on a CPLR 3211 motion and dismiss counts that don't line up.
What should you do before filing an LLC derivative action in New York?
Before you file an LLC derivative action in New York, you need to do three things: lock down the records, evaluate demand and demand futility, and decide whether you need emergency injunctive relief.
First, secure the books and records. Once you sue, the managing member's incentive to scrub emails, delete texts, and reorganize bank records goes up sharply. New York gives members a statutory right to inspect under LLCL § 1102, and you should use it before filing whenever possible. Our walk-through on how minority members force disclosure under § 1102 shows exactly how to make a written demand the courts will enforce.
Second, evaluate demand and demand futility. New York courts generally require you to make a pre-suit written demand on the LLC's management asking them to pursue the claim. If management refuses, the refusal itself can be challenged as the product of bad faith or a non-independent review. If demand would be futile (for example, because the wrongdoer is the only manager and would be deciding whether to sue himself), you can plead futility instead. Under established New York law, pleading futility requires specific factual allegations, not conclusions, about why a fair management decision was impossible. In Recine v. Recine, 2022 NY Slip Op 00324 (2d Dep't 2022), the managers allegedly diverted sale proceeds to their own businesses. The Second Department applied BCL § 626(c) to an LLC member and let the derivative complaint go forward because it alleged "with particularity that the Recine defendants, who constituted a majority of the managing members, were interested in the challenged transaction."
Third, decide whether you need a TRO or preliminary injunction. If the managing member is actively dissipating company assets, transferring real estate to a related entity, or about to close on the sale of the company's main contract, monetary damages alone may come too late. Pre-judgment injunctive relief under CPLR § 6301 can freeze the status quo while the case is litigated. Our guide on preliminary injunctions and TROs in New York explains the elements you need to show — likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, and a balance of equities in your favor. Injunctions are not automatic. In Recine, the same court reversed a preliminary injunction barring movement of the sale proceeds because money damages were an adequate remedy.
One more practical point: cases with disputed valuations almost always need forensic accountants. If the eventual remedy involves disgorging diverted profits or buying out a member, expect to spend $25,000 to $100,000 or more on financial experts before trial, and more if the case reaches a damages hearing. Our piece on LLC buyout valuation covers how courts price these disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to make a written demand before filing an LLC derivative action in New York?
Usually yes, unless you can plead specifically why demand would have been futile. Demand futility typically requires showing that the manager or majority of managers cannot exercise independent judgment because they are themselves the alleged wrongdoers or are dominated by them. Vague claims that "they would have refused" are not enough — courts want concrete facts.
Who pays my attorney's fees in a derivative case?
If you obtain a substantial benefit for the LLC, New York courts can award attorney's fees and costs out of the recovery under the common fund doctrine. That means the LLC effectively pays its share of the litigation cost from the funds your suit brought in. You still need to fund the case up front, however, and most commercial litigation firms handle derivative cases on an hourly basis with a retainer.
What's the statute of limitations for an LLC derivative action in New York?
It depends on the underlying claim. Breach of fiduciary duty claims seeking monetary damages generally carry a three-year limitations period under CPLR § 214, while those seeking equitable relief or rooted in fraud may run for six years under CPLR § 213. Acting quickly matters — both because evidence disappears and because the clock may already be running.
The Bottom Line
An LLC derivative action in New York is one of the most powerful tools a minority member has against a self-dealing manager — but it's also among the most procedurally demanding causes of action in commercial practice. Pleading it correctly, pairing it with the right direct claims, and timing it against demand and statute-of-limitations rules takes careful planning before you ever file.
If you or your business are facing self-dealing, misappropriation, or other misconduct by an LLC manager or business partner, the team at Yassi Law PC is ready to help. Call us today at 646-992-2138 for a consultation.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Although I am an attorney, I am not your attorney, and reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and may have changed since the publication of this article. For advice specific to your situation, consult a qualified attorney.
.png)